Copyrightable or Not?

Theory and Practice  Tagged , , , No Comments »

According to the blog post assignment I am supposed to determine whether or not a Calvin and Hobbes cartoon is protected under copyright law or not. For reference here is the link to the strip in question. What I finally came to a consensus of when debating whether or not the comic strip was copyrightable or not, I came to the conclusion that it is. Because the author of the comic strip, Bill Watterson, is still alive meaning that the work is still protected under U.S. copyright law. Therefore because the author is still alive and yet was not asked if his cartoon could be shown on this particular blog website, the copyright law has technically been broken. What copyright does is it helps an author, artist, ect, protect their work. It is the right for the owner to control what people can and cannot do with their work. In theory, in order to obtain permission to copy an author’s work, you would first have to track down the author, and then you would then contact the owner to ask permission to use their work. Sometimes it is even asked to pay a permission fee to use their work however that can be negotiable depending on the owner.

Primary Sources

Theory and Practice  Tagged , , , , No Comments »

Primary Source 1: http://arcweb.archives.gov/arc/action/ShowFullRecord?tab=showFullDescriptionTabs/details&%24searchId=4&%24showFullDescriptionTabs.selectedPaneId=digital&%24digiDetailPageModel.currentPage=0&%24resultsPartitionPageModel.targetModel=true&%24resultsSummaryPageModel.pageSize=10&%24partitionIndex=0&%24digiSummaryPageModel.targetModel=true&%24submitId=2&%24resultsDetailPageModel.search=true&%24digiDetailPageModel.resultPageModel=true&%24resultsDetailPageModel.currentPage=8&%24showArchivalDescriptionsTabs.selectedPaneId=&%24resultsDetailPageModel.pageSize=1&%24resultsSummaryPageModel.targetModel=true&%24sort=RELEVANCE_ASC&%24resultsPartitionPageModel.search=true&%24highlight=false link

This primary source is a digital copy of a voting record of the Constitutional Convention of 1787. What these records entail, are documented lists of who voted for what clauses that eventually produced what is now the Constitution. It is said in the documents that the votes were recorded by William Jackson, who was the secretary of the convention. Although the handwriting of the lists are hard to read as you can tell in the image I have posted below, what is nice about the records is that it can prove who voted for what to make the constitution what it is. One detail that I noted while analyzing the documents was that the column for the state of Rhode Island is blank because they did not participate in the convention. The other detail I noted was that the column for New York was blank for the later part of the convention votes, possibly because they left the convention early.

Rediscovery #01304 Job A1 08-131 Transparencies-1

 

Primary Source 2:  http://www.loc.gov/pictures/resource/hec.31617/?co=he link

This primary source is an image of a group of people in 1922 looking at the cherry blossoms in full bloom in Washington DC. What this photo gives an indication of, is how people in Washington DC were dressing in the 1920’s, along with the fact that it tells me that even then people were attending a viewing of the cherry blossoms blooming, which is now called the cherry blossom festival. In the background of the photo, you see the Washington Monument, and they seem to be standing next to a decent sized body of water. In the upper right hand corner there seems to be writing of some sort, which I took to be possibly the photographers initials or signature. The photograph was taken by Harris and Ewing, and convey a beautiful piece of imagery on what the Cherry Blossom festival used to be like.

31617r

 

If I had to choose a primary source that I found more difficult to analyze, it would have been the cherry blossom photograph. My reasoning for this, is that although it has historical meaning it is harder to find it by just looking at it, because at first glance all you see is a black and white photograph, but if you look deeper into the image you see that it is of the cherry blossom festival at an earlier date and time

 

Website Reviews

Theory and Practice  Tagged , , , , , No Comments »

The first website I looked at was:

http://library.brown.edu/cds/temperance/

This website is categorized as an archive website, and I believe is reliable because it is sponsored by the Brown University Library Center for digital scholarship. Having said this, I also explored the website, it allows you to browse and search for newspaper and journal articles of that time period during prohibition, providing the researcher with primary sources if that is what they are looking for. I did know about the bans and restrictions put on alcohol during this time before visiting this website, however I find it interesting that they provide you with articles directly when the ban was actually in place. It was easy to navigate, and the directions are clear on the home page. The purpose of this website is to give people an idea of the resources at Brown Universities library. Here is an example of the cover page of something that you could find in the website.

1124395205921875

 

 

The second website I looked at was:

http://www.17thc.us/

When first visiting this website, I got the impression that it was not necessarily the most reliable source for information about 17th Century New England. It appears to be an archive website, however I would not trust that. Its sponsors include “Britannica”, and “About the Best of the Net: September 1999.” The site’s home page was last updated in January of 2012, and other pages even earlier than that. When exploring the website, I did not find anything that was cited with credible sources and it appears as if someone put this website together with their own knowledge alone. One part I did find interesting is that when clicking on the primary sources page, the website provided links to credible websites such as the Library of Congress. My conclusion for this website is that it is potentially outdated and may not be the best website to use when looking up information about New England during this time, or in particular the Essex-County witch hunt of 1692.


© 2024 Elizabeth Purnell's Digital Past Blog.
WordPress Theme & Icons by N.Design Studio.   Hosted by onMason
Entries RSS Comments RSS Log in